Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby

“The jurisdiction of this Court of Record recognises no man made borders. Those who believe they are ‘legislators’ should consider that they have, by such legislation subjected themselves to the Relations of Ideas embodied.

Kindly notify, by Church ceremonial service, all levels of the judiciary, police and banking community of these Matters of Fact and Relations of Ideas.

Canterbury Cathedral

Canterbury Cathedral
Central Tower, South Transept &c. engraved by J. LeKeux after a picture by G. Cattermole, 1821.

“The purpose of this letter is to assist Your Grace to unfold the Relations of Ideas and Matters of Fact that constitute government by consent. We know from historical records that the world was freed from the tyranny of Caesar by the grace of Jesus Christ through Saint Peter.”

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby

The Most Rev and Rt Hon The Lord Archbishop of Canterbury,
Lambeth Palace,
London, SE1 7JU.


Open Letter
Amicus curiæ
14th October 2013


Dear Archbishop Justin Welby,

In the name of Our Sovereign Lady, greeting ! Ave Maria !

His Holiness Pope Francis has indicated a definitive choice that settles the question of how the Universal Church of God shall be governed.

The purpose of this letter is to assist Your Grace to unfold the Relations of Ideas and Matters of Fact that constitute government by consent. We know from historical records that the world was freed from the tyranny of Caesar by the grace of Jesus Christ through Saint Peter.

The legacy that Her Majesty The Queen of England represents for all the people of the world is the Rule of Law freed from the Brutum Fulmen of Caesar, which in this Court of Record is called the English Trust.

The English Constitution

In the famous thesis by that name, Walter Bagehot outlines the difficulty in describing the nature of the unwritten, living constitution of the English.

There is a great difficulty in the way of a writer who attempts to sketch a living Constitution—a Constitution that is in actual work and power. The difficulty is that the object is in constant change. An historical writer does not feel this difficulty: he deals only with the past; he can say definitely, the Constitution worked in such and such a manner in the year at which he begins, and in a manner in such and such respects different in the year at which he ends; he begins with a definite point of time and ends with one also. But a contemporary writer who tries to paint what is before him is puzzled and a perplexed: what he sees is changing daily. He must paint it as it stood at some one time, or else he will be putting side by side in his representations things which never were contemporaneous in reality. The difficulty is the greater because a writer who deals with a living Government naturally compares it with the most important other living Governments, and these are changing too; what he illustrates are altered in one way, and his sources of illustration are altered probably in a different way.

The visible actors on the stage, each have their own Relations of Ideas on how government actually works in practice. The debates in Parliament appear to produce real world changes in the benefits and policies that effect the common man. As a result, many fail to distinguish between Power and Force, adopting the primitive belief summarised by, “power flows from the barrel of a gun”. The result is that Relations of Ideas are dismissed as irrelevant and Matters of Fact are worshipped as the fatted golden calf; which is to treat E = mc2 as irrelevant whilst worshipping the atom bomb.

Contemporary politicians, pushed by the ‘conservative’ inertia of the past, are still in pursuit of ‘independence’ and ‘strong borders’. They fail to see the interdependence of all the people of Earth and wrongly assume that the government has the power to ‘print money’ in peace time.

They assume wrongly, that criminals can be ‘sent back’ to a place where the problem ceases to be a concern. Perhaps they should reconsider their position, for many criminals inhabit government, banking and corporate instrumentalities of the UNITED KINGDOM, that these men and women are, by oath of office or acceptance of Directorship, foreign to the people of England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and that such people can therefore be stripped of all privileges, ‘bank accounts’ and passports, and sent to a remote ‘foreign’ location where they can learn once again to live by Common Law that is the King James Bible and be nice to their neighbours who may not look like them.

The jurisdiction of this Court of Record recognises no man made borders. Those who believe they are ‘legislators’ should consider that they have, by such legislation subjected themselves to the Relations of Ideas embodied.

Legislation by a corporate body has no power to bind any name or title other than that granted by the corporate body – thus today’s legislation does not bind any living man or woman except by voluntary acceptance, for example, acceptance constituted by a government pay cheque.

The ‘invisible judicial contract’ created by a bank account is hereby declared to have no power to constitute voluntary acceptance of jurisdiction. Additional detail is in the enclosed open letters of this Court of Record.

Kindly notify, by Church ceremonial service, all levels of the judiciary, police and banking community of these Matters of Fact and Relations of Ideas.

We pray that the Immaculate Virgin Mary and Jesus are with Your Grace!

Yours faithfully,



Joseph Ray Sundarsson

GICOR-ref: ABC-2/v1.0

GLOBAL ISLES COURT OF RECORD